Negative Transformational Process: The Maladaptive Nature of Accommodation in Relationships

Authors

  • Mary Ann S Psychologist, Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India

Keywords:

Emotion regulation, Dyadic Interaction, Interdependence, Transformation of Motivation, Marital relationship

Abstract

The theoretical focus is to understand the role of emotional regulation in the dyadic interactions and to account for well-being in marital relationships. Emotions are concealed or expressed at the level of human processing. Therefore, masking emotional expression becomes a threat to well-being. The model brings a distinction between the adaptive and maladaptive transformation of motivation by enabling the bridge between interdependence theory and emotion regulation theory. Transformation of motivation is defined as the shift in the person understanding and interpretation of the situation as defined by the interdependence theory. The activation between emotional stimuli and regulatory mechanism would signify that transformation occurs during the interpretive stage of the situation. It is therefore aiding in providing a concise description of effective use of emotional coping strategy in marital interaction by questioning long-term outcomes in relationships. The current paper reviews the emotional interdependence found in couple’s interactions and the process of shift aiding in accommodating difficult emotions. The process model is based upon the theoretical underpinnings in interdependence theory and emotional regulation theory wherein the process of taking a decision involves reappraisal of the weighted advantage. This weighted advantage if seen as a profit, the person mostly likely to take the adaptive route. If there are alternatives that are perceived opposed to the weighted advantage, the emotional regulation strategies hence become maladaptive. This supports the given model indicating that well-being will be decreased if the transformational process involves suppressive nature which in turn leading to maladaptive coping patterns among the partners.

References

Arriaga, X. B. (2010) ‘Interdependent With Caryl Rusbult’, Personal Relationships, 17(2), pp. 155–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01262.x.

Butler, E. A. et al. (2003) ‘The social consequences of expressive suppression.’, Emotion, 3(1), pp. 48–67. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48.

Clark, M. S. and Taraban, C. (1991) ‘Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in communal and exchange relationships’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(4), pp. 324–336. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90029-6.

Finkel, E. J. and Campbell, W. K. (2001) ‘Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: an interdependence analysis.’, Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(2), pp. 263–277. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.263.

Fiske, S. T. (1992) ‘Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto.’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), pp. 877–889. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.877.

Gross, J. J. and John, O. P. (2003) ‘Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), pp. 348–362. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.

Gross, J. J., Sheppes, G. and Urry, H. L. (2011) ‘Cognition and Emotion Lecture at the 2010 SPSP Emotion Preconference’, Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), pp. 765–781. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.555753.

Lange, P. Van and Rusbult, C. (2012) ‘Interdependence theory’, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 3(1959), pp. 251–272. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n39.

Lazarus, R. S. (2006) ‘Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping’, Journal of Personality, 74(1), pp. 9–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x.

McRae, K. et al. (2012) ‘Individual differences in reappraisal ability: Links to reappraisal frequency, well-being, and cognitive control’, Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), pp. 2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.003.

Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A. and Berscheid, E. (2000) ‘The relationship context of human behavior and development.’, Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), pp. 844–872. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844.

Richards, J. M., Butler, E. A. and Gross, J. J. (2003) ‘Emotion Regulation in Romantic Relationships: The Cognitive Consequences of Concealing Feelings’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(5), pp. 599–620. doi: 10.1177/02654075030205002.

Rusbult, C. E. and Van Lange, P. a. M. (2008) ‘Why we need interdependence theory’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), pp. 2049–2070. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00147.x.

Velotti, P. et al. (2015) ‘Emotional suppression in early marriage: Actor, partner, and similarity effects on marital quality’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), pp. 277–302. doi: 10.1177/0265407515574466.

Published

28-12-2021

How to Cite

Negative Transformational Process: The Maladaptive Nature of Accommodation in Relationships. (2021). Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(01), 81-84. https://ojs.ijcp.co.in/index.php/ijcp/article/view/35

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.